Document And Entity Information
|
Document And Entity Information
|
3 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Apr. 30, 2012
|
|
| Document And Entity Information [Abstract] | ||
| Document type | 10-Q | |
| Amendment Flag | false | |
| Document Period End Date | Mar. 31, 2012 | |
| Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q1 | |
| Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2012 | |
| Entity Registrant Name | HERITAGE BANKSHARES INC /VA | |
| Entity Central Index Key | 0000719731 | |
| Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
| Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | |
| Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 2,305,965 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical)
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
|---|---|---|
| Preferred stock, par value | $ 0 | $ 0 |
| Preferred stock, shares authorized | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Common stock, par value | $ 5 | $ 5 |
| Common stock, shares authorized | 6,000,000 | 6,000,000 |
| Common stock, shares issued | 2,305,965 | 2,304,965 |
| Common stock, shares outstanding | 2,305,965 | 2,304,965 |
|
Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C [Member]
|
||
| Preferred stock, shares issued | 7,800 | 7,800 |
| Preferred stock, shares outstanding | 7,800 | 7,800 |
Consolidated Statements Of Income
Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income
|
Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Mar. 31, 2011
|
|
| Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income [Abstract] | ||
| Net income for three months ended March 31 | $ 630 | $ 560 |
| Unrealized holding losses on securities available for sale | (233) | (115) |
| Tax effect on unrealized losses | 80 | 39 |
| Total comprehensive income | $ 477 | $ 484 |
Principles Of Consolidation And Basis Of Presentation
|
Principles Of Consolidation And Basis Of Presentation
|
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
|
| Principles Of Consolidation And Basis Of Presentation [Abstract] | |
| Principles Of Consolidation And Basis Of Presentation | Note 1 – Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Heritage Bank. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Heritage Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia in 1983, and the Company serves as the holding company for its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company’s only subsidiary, Heritage Bank (the “Bank”), is a state banking corporation engaged in the general commercial and retail banking business. The Bank is a full-service bank conducting a general commercial and consumer banking business with its customers located throughout the Hampton Roads area of Virginia. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and with the instructions for Form 10‑Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with and with reference to the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2011. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements to conform to current period presentation. The Company believes its critical accounting policies are those that are particularly sensitive in terms of judgments and the extent to which estimates are used, and such policies include (a) the valuation of the allowance for loan losses and the impairment of loans, (b) the impairment of financial investments and other accounts, (c) the deferral of loan fees and direct loan origination costs, and (d) accounting for income taxes. Allowance for Loan Losses; Impairment of Loans. The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb estimated credit losses on existing loans. The amount of the allowance is affected by: (1) loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance, (2) recoveries on loans previously charged-off, which increase the allowance, and (3) the provision for loan losses charged to income, which increases the allowance. The Bank analyzes its loan portfolio through ongoing credit review processes and constructs a comprehensive allowance analysis for its loan portfolio at least quarterly. This analysis includes two basic elements: (1) specific allowances for individual loans, and (2) general allowances for loan portfolio segments, which factor in historical loan loss experience and delinquency rates for the Bank and the banking industry and numerous other environmental factors. The Bank evaluates various loans individually for impairment based on guidance for receivables. The evaluation is based upon either discounted cash flows or collateral evaluations. If the evaluation shows that a particular loan is impaired, then a specific reserve is established, or a charge-off is made, for the amount of any impairment. For loans without an individual measure of impairment, the Bank makes estimates of losses for groups of loans as provided by guidance for contingencies. As part of the loan loss reserve methodology, loans are placed into one of four major categories or segments of loans: (1) commercial and industrial loans, (2) consumer loans, (3) 1-4 family residential loans (including home equity loans and lines), and (4) multi-family and other commercial real estate loans. The Bank then considers the impact of various bank, industry, economic and other environmental factors and documents, which are further used in the analysis. The Bank’s allowance for loan losses is divided into four distinct portions: (1) Historical – an amount based on the Bank’s actual net charge-offs; (2) Impaired Loans – an amount for specific allocations on significant individual credits as prescribed by guidance for receivables; (3) Loan Segments – an amount to adjust the historical allocation for the four loan segments based on environmental factors as provided by guidance for contingencies; and (4) Unallocated – an amount to reflect the imprecision inherent in these calculations. Impairment of Financial Investments and Other Accounts. Impairment of investment securities, other equity investments and other asset accounts results in a write-down that must be included in net income when the fair value of the asset declines below cost and the decline is other-than-temporary. The fair values of these investments and other assets are subject to change, as they are influenced by market conditions and management decisions. Deferral of Loan Fees and Direct Loan Origination Costs. Generally accepted accounting principles relating to accounts receivable require that loan fees and direct loan origination costs be deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the loan’s yield. While the amount of fees to be deferred is generally apparent in the origination of a loan, the Company utilizes estimates to determine the amount of deferred direct origination costs, especially payroll costs, that are attributable to the loan origination process. Management’s estimates of the amount of costs associated with successful loan origination activities are reviewed and updated annually. Accounting for Income Taxes. The determination of the Company’s effective tax rate requires judgment. In the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax outcomes are uncertain. In addition, the Company’s tax returns are subject to audit by various tax authorities. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the final tax outcome will not be materially different than that which is reflected in the income tax provision and accrual. Subsequent Events. In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in these financial statements through the date the financial statements were issued. Recent Accounting Pronouncements The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements: In April 2011, the criteria used to determine effective control of transferred assets in the Transfers and Servicing topic of the ASC was amended by ASU 2011-03. The requirement for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion were removed from the assessment of effective control. The other criteria to assess effective control were not changed. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and had no effect on the financial statements.
ASU 2011-04 was issued in May 2011 to amend the Fair Value Measurement topic of the ASC by clarifying the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and by changing particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments were effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 and had no effect on the financial statements.
The Comprehensive Income topic of the ASC was amended in June 2011. The amendment eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income as a part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income. The amendments were applicable to the Company on January 1, 2012 and have been applied retrospectively. In December 2011, the topic was further amended to defer the effective date of presenting reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. Companies should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect prior to the amendments while FASB redeliberates future requirements. Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
Share-Based Compensation
|
Share-Based Compensation
|
3 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
|
| Share-Based Compensation [Abstract] | |
| Share-Based Compensation | Note 2 – Share-Based Compensation The following table presents a summary of stock option activity for the period of January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012.
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the quarter and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on March 31, 2012. The amount changes based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock, as reflected by stock market prices. The Company’s current policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy option exercises. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $3,700. Cash received from exercises of options during the first three months of 2012 was $7,500. There were no options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2011. On January 25, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors granted, effective February 1, 2012, 43,600 shares of restricted stock to certain executives under the Heritage 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (“2006 Incentive Plan”). The shares vest at a rate of 20% over a five year period beginning on February 1, 2013 and on each February 1 thereafter. Upon the death or permanent disability of the executive or a change of control of the Company, any remaining unvested shares will vest immediately.
As defined in the 2006 Incentive Plan, fair value of the shares was measured by the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on the grant date of the applicable award or, if the Company’s shares were not traded on the grant-date, then the closing price of a share of common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on the next preceding date on which a trade occurred. In addition, because the share-recipients are not entitled to dividends until the shares vest, the grant date fair value of the award was reduced by the present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the underlying shares during the service period, discounted at the appropriate risk-free interest rate.
The following table presents a summary of restricted stock award activity for the period of January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012.
The amount charged against income, before income tax benefit of $5,574, in relation to stock‑based payment arrangements was $21,651 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The amount charged against income, before income tax benefit of $620, in relation to stock‑based payment arrangements was $16,173 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2012, unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock option and restricted stock grants was $492,578 and is currently expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years as follows:
|
Earnings Per Common Share Reconciliation
|
Earnings Per Common Share Reconciliation
|
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings Per Common Share Reconciliation [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings Per Common Share Reconciliation | Note 3 – Earnings Per Common Share Reconciliation The Company’s basic and diluted earnings per common share calculations are presented in the following table.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disclosure About Fair Value Of Financial Instruments
|
Disclosure About Fair Value Of Financial Instruments
|
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure About Fair Value Of Financial Instruments [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure About Fair Value Of Financial Instruments | Note 4 – Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following summary presents an estimate of the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Because no active market readily exists for a portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair values of some financial instruments are based on estimates using present value and other valuation techniques. Much of the information used to determine fair value is highly subjective in nature and therefore the results may not be precise. The subjective factors include, among other things, estimates of cash flows, risk characteristics, credit quality and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. Accordingly, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid upon settlement or maturity of the various instruments could be significantly different. The following table presents the carrying amounts, fair value and level of input of those financial instruments whose fair value differs from carrying amount at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||